Difference between revisions of "Hidden subsidy in rooftop solar"

From ScienceForSustainability
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
[[Category: Editorial]]
[[Category: Editorial]]
[[Category: Solar PV]]
[[Category: Solar PV]]
[[Category: Subsidies]]
[[Category: Energy storage]]
[[Category: Energy storage]]
[[Category: Net metering]]
[[Category: Net metering]]

Latest revision as of 07:04, 6 February 2021

Rooftop solar and home battery installations effectively subsidise wealthier electricity consumers who can afford such installations at the expense of everyone else, including generally poorer consumers who cannot afford them.


Rooftop solar[1] reduces the owner's electricity bills according to the amount of self-generated energy the household uses. This consequently reduces the earnings of their grid electricity supplier. The supplier saves a little of that lost income through having to buy less fuel, but they still have the costs of keeping their generators and the grid network running. Many suppliers are also obliged to run energy efficiency programmes and to subsidise low income customers, adding to their fixed costs. Since they make less income from the solar-owning customer, the supplier will have to charge everybody else more to keep its income steady and stay in business. This amounts to a subsidy to the higher-income customers who own their own homes and who can afford solar installations, paid for by everybody else, including lower-income customers who cannot afford rooftop PV. Increased energy prices disproportionately hit society’s poorest people who tend to spend the greatest proportion of their incomes on fuel.

Net metering

Net metering[2] further subsidises the owner of rooftop solar. By offsetting electricity exported to the grid from energy consumed by the household (effectively or actually making the electricity meter run backwards when the rooftop panels are generating more than the household is using) it effectively pays the household the same rate for electricity they generate and export to the grid as consumers pay for energy they consume; a far higher price than utility suppliers get. If the metering period extends over periods of many months, rolling over credits for electricity generated from one month to the next, it allows the owner to use payment for electricity generated in, say, July against electricity they consume in January.


Even without net metering a wealthy consumer can obtain an effective subsidy by installing a battery to store electricity when their PV system is generating it - when, typically, the consumer doesn't need it - and using it later, when they do need it, saving the cost of buying peak-rate electricity from the grid. The consumer still demands electricity from their utility supplier when their home PV + battery installation cannot supply it, and the utility still has the fixed costs of its generator plant, transmission networks etc to maintain, so the wealthy consumer's savings have to be recouped from higher prices for everyone else.

Further reading

Can Net Metering Reform Fix the Rooftop Solar Cost Shift? Severin Borenstein' Energy Institute at HAAS blog; 25 Jan 2021

Footnotes and references

  1. This does not have to be literally on a roof but includes any solar PV, which could for example be installed in a garden, which is connected to the consumer's side of their electricity meter.
  2. Net metering is also known a Net Energy Metering (NEM)